Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A series of copper complexes based on the tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine (TPA) ligand are examined for their oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity. Increasing the potential of the Cu(I/II) couple from 0.23 V vs RHE for [Cu(TPA)(L)](2+) to 0.52 V for [Cu(TEPA)(L)](2+) (tris(2-pyridylethyl)amine) at pH 7 or adding a hydrogen-bonding secondary coordination sphere does not increase the onset potential from 0.69 V vs RHE for the ORR. The underlying mechanism for the ORR is determined to be first-order in O(2) and second-order in Cu. The rate-determining step is found to not be Cu(II) to Cu(I) reduction, as seen in other systems. The rate-determining step is also not the protonation of an intermediate, but may be the reduction of a hydroperoxo intermediate. Pyrolysis of the Cu complex of TPA affords an inactive material; activity is recovered through addition of intact TPA to the electrode surface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thorseth et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: