Research Article| January 01, 2005 Topology of Microporous Structures Sergey Krivovichev Sergey Krivovichev Department of Crystallography, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia, sergey.krivovichev@uibk.ac.at Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry (2005) 57 (1): 17–68. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2005.57.2 Article history first online: 03 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Sergey Krivovichev; Topology of Microporous Structures. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 2005;; 57 (1): 17–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2005.57.2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyReviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Search Advanced Search Microporous crystalline compounds have attracted considerable attention because of their applications in various areas of technology, including catalysis, radioactive waste management, gas separation, adsorption, ion-exchange, etc. Until recently, the major part of research in this field was focused on zeolites and related materials based upon open three-dimensional (3D) frameworks of linked tetrahedra. However, within the last 10–15 years, the quest for new microporous materials led researchers to explore other possibilities, e.g., framework materials containing non-tetrahedral cations that play a crucial role in a framework construction. As for zeolites, this research direction renewed interest in mineral phases as materials formed in... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sergey V. Krivovichev (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: