Key result
A 12-week physiotherapy-led remote cardiac rehabilitation program was feasible, with all 11 completing patients achieving UK physical activity guidelines and improving SEE and SWLC.
Why the study?
To determine the feasibility of physiotherapy-led remote cardiac rehabilitation for ACHD patients and quantify its impact on physical activity levels and well-being.
Does a 12-week physiotherapy-led remote cardiac rehabilitation program improve physical activity and well-being in sedentary complex ACHD patients?
Does a 12-week physiotherapy-led remote cardiac rehabilitation program improve physical activity and well-being in sedentary complex ACHD patients?
Effect estimate: mean increase of 23 in SEE and 10 in SWLC
A 12-week personalized remote cardiac rehabilitation program is feasible for ACHD patients and significantly improves physical activity levels and patient-reported well-being.
Remote CR appears feasible for complex ACHD; leaves open efficacy on activity and well-being in randomized trials.
Objective To determine the feasibility of physiotherapy led remote cardiac rehabilitation (RCR) for Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD) patients and quantify the impact on physical activity levels and well-being. Method ACHD cardiologists referred sedentary complex ACHD patients over 3 months, for 12-week physiotherapy-led RCR. RCR provided individualised exercise program and coaching via telephone clinics and apps. Outcomes in Self Efficacy for Exercise (SEE) and Satisfaction with Life Score (SWLC) were assessed by comparing patients' responses upon program completion to baseline. Results 23 patients were referred, 11 completed the programme, 3 had learning difficulties. Participants were mainly female (9); age range 18–61 (median 24). Reasons for not completing RCR included; failure to attend initial appointments (7), lack of interest (1), too unwell (1), lost at follow up (1) and a death unrelated to RCR. Initially no patients were achieving the UK Physical Activity Guidelines; all 11 became more active fulfilling the guidelines. Improvements were seen in SEE with a mean increase of 23 (SD 12) and a mean improvement of 10 (SD 4) in SWLC. Participants (9) responded well to apps. Reasons for not using apps included limited phone storage capacity to download the app (1) or lack of device (2). Patients found RCR acceptable and a personalised approach was essential to improving efficacy. Conclusion RCR is feasible, allowing patients to access specialised, personalised exercise advice and prescription and become more active, improving quality of life (QOL). Future work is required to improve uptake and extend to larger patient numbers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Curtis et al. (2021) studied Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD) (n=23). Physiotherapy-led remote cardiac rehabilitation (RCR) vs. Baseline was evaluated on Self Efficacy for Exercise (SEE) and Satisfaction with Life Score (SWLC) (mean increase of 23 in SEE and 10 in SWLC). A 12-week physiotherapy-led remote cardiac rehabilitation program was feasible, with all 11 completing patients achieving UK physical activity guidelines and improving SEE and SWLC.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: