Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assembly of replication-competent hepadnavirus nucleocapsids requires interaction of core protein, polymerase and encapsidation signal (epsilon) with viral pregenomic RNA. The N-terminal portion (aa 1-149) of the core protein is able to self-assemble into nucleocapsids, whereas the C-terminal portion (aa 150-183) is known to interact with pregenomic RNA. In this study, two hepatitis B virus (HBV) core mutants (C144Arg and C144Lys) in which the C-terminal SPRRR (Ser-Pro-Arg-Arg-Arg) motif was replaced by a stretch of arginine or lysine residues were generated to test their role in pregenome encapsidation and virus maturation. Mutant or wild-type core-expression plasmids were co-transfected with a core-negative plasmid into human hepatoma HuH-7 cells to compare trans-complementation efficiency for virus replication. Both low- and high-density capsids were present in -the cytoplasm and culture medium of HuH-7 cells in all transfections. Nucleocapsids formed by C144Arg and C144Lys, however, lost the endogenous polymerase activity to repair HBV DNA. Furthermore, in co-transfection of pHBVC144Arg or pHBVC144Lys with a plasmid which produces replication-competent nucleocapsids, the HBV DNA repairing signal was reduced 40- to 80-fold. This is probably due to formation of mosaic particles of wild-type and mutant cores. Results indicated that the SPRRR motif at the core protein C terminus is important for HBV DNA replication and maturation. Additionally, triple-plasmid transfection experiments showed that nucleocapsids containing various amounts of C144Arg and wild-type core proteins exhibited a bias in selecting a shorter pregenome for encapsidation and DNA replication. It is therefore suggested that unknown factors are also involved in HBV pregenome packaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hui et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: