Contraception separates sexual activity from procreation, allowing couples better control and planning of their lives, and consequently their families. Various contraceptive methods enable an individualized approach and selection based on the medical needs and personal preferences of users. This reduces the risk of side effects and discontinuation of the method while increasing user satisfaction. Available contraceptive methods can be categorized as biological (hormonal and intrauterine), mechanical (condom, diaphragm, cervical cap), chemical (spermicides), and natural (calendar method, appearance and quantity of cervical mucus, basal body temperature). The most commonly used methods include: combined hormonal contraceptive pills, progestin-only or mini-pills, intrauterine contraception (levonorgestrel or Cu/Ag), transdermal patch, implants, injections, spermicides, periodic abstinence methods, withdrawal, cervical CAP, sponges, diaphragm, condoms (male and female), emergency contraception methods (levonorgestrel, ulipristal acetate, and copper IUD), and sterilization methods (male and female). Modern recommendations emphasize the importance of an individualized approach when selecting a contraceptive method. However, for the youth population, there is a growing global trend towards recommending long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods, such as intrauterine devices and implants, along with dual protection through condom use, to prevent sexually transmitted infections. Effective contraception counseling remains a significant challenge today. It often requires cooperation between healthcare professionals and patients, with a joint assessment of desires and needs on one hand, and the benefits and risks on the other. Considering an individualized approach in decision-making regarding contraceptive method selection is crucial and can contribute to greater satisfaction, acceptance, and adherence to the chosen method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ana Mitrović-Jovanović (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: