This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Neurosurgery is a demanding specialty, and a trainee’s exposure to its tenets is usually achieved through residency. Medical students only access neurosurgical knowledge via brief stints in clerkships/electives and often lack mentorship and early exposure. This study sought to investigate the varying expectations about neurosurgical training held by Canadian medical students, with the goal of determining the impact of early exposure through educational opportunities and mentorship in developing interest and familiarity in the field. Methods: A cross-sectional study across Canada was conducted where students were provided with a 35-point questionnaire pertaining to mentorship, educational opportunities and interests regarding neurosurgery through REDcap. Questions were open-ended, closed-ended (single choice) or five-point Likert scale (matrix format). Interest in pursuing neurosurgery was selected as the primary outcome of this study and was dichotomized into high or low interest. Predictors of interest were determined using multivariable logistic regressions. Results: A total of 136 students from 14 accredited Canadian medical schools responded to the study. Most (55.9%) had prior exposure, and the most commonly reported deterring factors were work–life balance (94.5%) and family (84.6%). Predictors of interest included participation in relevant case-based discussion (OR = 2.644, 95% CI [1.221–5.847], p = 0.015) and involvement in neurosurgical research encouraged by home institution (OR = 1.619, 95% CI [1.124–2.396], p = 0.012). Discussion Future efforts to improve student interest should focus on early exposure to the field such as developing pre-clerkship neurosurgical electives or medical student groups focused on neurosurgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arfaie et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: