Meta-analysis reveals lower lung cancer risk with magnesium intake below 300 mg daily across 585,821 individuals, indicating potential protective effects at moderate intake levels.
Magnesium may reduce the risk of lung cancer by affecting cell proliferation, inflammation and by preserving lung function; however, the results of epidemiological studies on the potential benefits of magnesium in lung pathology are inconclusive. We conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the association between magnesium intake and the risk of lung cancer. A total of 5 studies were extracted from PubMed, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Review (to May 2018). These studies involved 58,5821 participants with 8,977 lung cancer cases. The pooled relative risk (RR) indicated a significant association between lung cancer incidence and magnesium intake (RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.79 to 0.98; p = 0.018). To investigate the cause of heterogeneity of these studies (I2 = 75.8%, p < 0.001), we performed a subgroup analysis which was affected by the mean dose of magnesium intake, where doses of magnesium intake lower than 300 mg/d significantly decreased lung cancer risk (RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.99; p = 0.034). Increasing magnesium intake doses to over 300 mg/d did not reduce the incidence of lung cancer (RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.78 to 1.01; p = 0.076). Our meta-analysis suggests that magnesium intake of less than 300 mg/d may have protective effects in lung cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karimi et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: