Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show that there were differences in the use of Twitter by at AAU schools. Affordance use differed between the personal and professional tweets professors as categorized by turkers. Framing behaviors were described that could impact the of tweets by audience members. /methodology/approach – A three phase research design was used that included surveys of , categorization of tweets by workers in Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, and categorization tweets by active professors on Twitter. – There were significant differences found between professors that reported having Twitter account, significant differences found between types of Twitter accounts (personal, , or both), and significant differences in the affordances used in personal and professional . Framing behaviors were described that may assist altmetric researchers in distinguishing personal and professional tweets. limitations/implications – The study is limited by the sample population, survey , low survey response rate, and low Cohen’s κ. implications – An overview of various affordances found in Twitter is provided and a use of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk for the categorization of tweets is described that can applied to future altmetric studies. /value – This work utilizes a socio-technical framework integrating social and theories to interpret results from the tweeting behavior of professors and the of tweets by workers in Amazon’s Mechanical Turk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Timothy D. Bowman (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: