Key result
Main team U19 football players exhibited a significantly higher training impulse by 16.7% and a 22.0% difference in blood lactate compared to backup players during the second series of intermittent endurance testing.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to determine the characteristics of the functional training of U19 football players aged 18-19 years old.
Cross-Sectional (n=18)
No
Main team U19 football players demonstrate superior functional capacity and reduced physiological stress compared to backup players during specialized testing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform U19 football squad selection; cross-sectional data leave causal effects of training on capacity open.
Introduction. The improvement of the special training of U19 football players is based on the implementation of the conversion of general functional training into special structures for the functional support of the players' special working capacity. The general principles are based on the simulation of test modes and corresponding training loads. which correspond to the tempo-rhythmic structure of the athletes' competitive activity. Goal. To determine the characteristics of the functional training of football players of the age category U19 (18-19 years old). Methods. Gas analysis, measurement of blood lactate concentration, CRS & IE test. 18 players aged 18-19 took part in the study. The results. The characteristics of the functional support of the special working capacity of the players of the main team had the corresponding characteristics – x ̅, quartile 75%, the maximum value: in the first series, EqPaCO2 – 2,03, 2,15, 2,26; VO2 – 49,4, 51,6, 54,1 (ml·min-1·kg-1); La – 9,4, 10,8, 11,0 (mmol·l-1); in the second series – EqVCO2 – 34,4, 36,9, 37,3, EqVO2 – 33,1, 35,2, 36,2;, VO2 – 56,1, 58,9, 60,1 (ml·min-1·kg-1), La– 16,8, 17,5, 18,9 (mmol·l-1). Conclusions. The characteristics of EqPaCO2, VO2, La registered as a result of the first series had differences between athletes of group "A" (players of the main team) and group "B" (players of the backup team), respectively - 3.4%, 5.3%, 4.3%. Characteristics EqVCO2, EqVO2, VO2, La registered as a result of the second series – 9,9%, 2,1%, 11,9%, 22,0% (p<0,05). The indicators of the "training impulse" of the players of group "A", respectively, of the players of group "B" are significantly higher in the first series by 10,5%, in the second - by 16,7%. This indicates a reduced level of physiological stress of the main team players.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Дяченко et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy football players (n=18). Main team status (Group A) vs. Backup team status (Group B) was evaluated on Training impulse during the second series of the CRS & IE test (16.7% difference, p=<0.05). Main team U19 football players exhibited a significantly higher training impulse by 16.7% and a 22.0% difference in blood lactate compared to backup players during the second series of intermittent endurance testing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: