Key result
A highly pro-inflammatory diet was associated with increased odds of metabolic syndrome compared to the least inflammatory diet in urban Ecuadorian women (OR 4.4; 95% CI 2.0-9.63; p<0.001).
Why the study?
Few studies have evaluated the association of dietary inflammation with metabolic syndrome and cardiometabolic risk in Latin American populations, and existing findings remain inconsistent.
Does a pro-inflammatory diet increase the risk of metabolic syndrome and cardiometabolic risk factors in urban Ecuadorian women?
Cross-Sectional (n=276)
Does a pro-inflammatory diet increase the risk of metabolic syndrome and cardiometabolic risk factors in urban Ecuadorian women?
A more pro-inflammatory diet is significantly associated with increased odds of metabolic syndrome and poorer cardiometabolic health markers in urban Ecuadorian women.
Hypothesis-generating for dietary inflammation in MetS; prospective studies needed before clinical adoption.
Low-grade systemic inflammation is implicated in metabolic syndrome (MetS) and cardiometabolic diseases. Diet is hypothesized to be an important low-grade inflammation modifier. However, few studies have examined the association of dietary inflammation with MetS and cardiometabolic risk in Latin American populations and their findings are inconsistent. Our cross-sectional study examined the association of dietary inflammatory potential with MetS and cardiometabolic risk components in 276 urban Ecuadorian women. Dietary inflammation was evaluated using an energy-adjusted Dietary Inflammatory Index (E-DII), divided into quartiles (Q). E-DII scores ranged from −4.89 (most anti-inflammatory) to 4.45 (most pro-inflammatory). Participants in the most pro-inflammatory (Q4) compared to the least inflammatory E-DII quartile (Q1) had a 4.4 increased adjusted odds for MetS (95% C.I. = 2.0, 9.63; p < 0.001). Every one-unit increase in E-DII was associated with a 1.4 increase in MetS (95% CI = 1.22, 1.52; p < 0.001). In other adjusted models, the most pro-inflammatory E-DII quartile (Q4) was positively associated with total blood cholesterol and triglycerides (p < 0.001), LDL-c (p = 0.007), diastolic blood pressure (p< 0.002), mean arterial pressure (p < 0.006), waist circumference (p < 0.008), and Framingham risk score (p < 0.001). However, the previously identified associations with pulse wave velocity and BMI were no longer evident in the models. These findings suggest that more pro-inflammatory diets may contribute to poorer cardiometabolic health. Promoting healthier diets with a lower inflammatory potential may help to prevent or slow development of cardiometabolic disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Metabolic syndrome and cardiometabolic risk (n=276). Pro-inflammatory diet (highest E-DII quartile) vs. Anti-inflammatory diet (lowest E-DII quartile) was evaluated on Metabolic syndrome (MetS) (OR 4.4, 95% CI 2.0-9.63, p=< 0.001). A highly pro-inflammatory diet was associated with increased odds of metabolic syndrome compared to the least inflammatory diet in urban Ecuadorian women (OR 4.4; 95% CI 2.0-9.63; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: