Why the study?
Does oral WIN 54954 prevent rhinovirus infection and illness in healthy volunteers challenged with rhinovirus?
Does oral WIN 54954 prevent rhinovirus infection and illness in healthy volunteers challenged with rhinovirus?
Oral WIN 54954 failed to prevent experimental rhinovirus infection or illness, likely due to inadequate drug delivery to the nasal mucosa despite adequate plasma levels.
WIN 54954 shows no prophylactic effect in rhinovirus challenge; challenges further development of this oral capsid binder for respiratory viruses.
The efficacy of oral WIN 54954 for the prevention of rhinovirus infection and illness was tested in two randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled volunteer challenge studies. Volunteers were inoculated with rhinovirus type 39 (MIC of WIN 54954, 0.17 microgram/ml) or rhinovirus type 23 (MIC, 0.016 microgram/ml). The volunteers received two doses of drug (600 mg per dose) or placebo on the first day; this was followed by three doses on each of the subsequent 5 days. All volunteers were challenged with virus after the third dose of study drug. No significant antiviral or clinical effect was detected in either study. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed that on the last day of drug administration, 38 of 39 (97%) volunteers had trough levels of WIN 54954 in plasma greater than the MIC for the respective virus. Nasal wash specimens collected on the same day revealed a detectable level in only 6 of 24 (25%) volunteers at the peak (range, 6 to 24 ng/ml) and in only 2 of 14 (14%) volunteers at the trough (range, 6 and 7 ng/ml). These results suggest that the lack of efficacy of WIN 54954 against rhinovirus may be related to an inability to deliver sufficient drug to the site of viral infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Turner et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: