Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tuftsin (Thr-Lys-Pro-Arg) receptor was purified to apparent homogeneity by affinity chromatography, using a pentapeptide analog (Thr-Lys-Pro-Pro-Arg) that binds the receptor more than 4 times as avidly as tuftsin. The analog was covalently linked to a solid support (Affi-Gel 10). Rabbit peritoneal granulocyte membrane solubilized with 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate was applied to the affinity column, the column was washed with 0.1 M ammonium carbonate (pH 7.9) and 0.1 M ammonium acetate (pH 5), and bound material was eluted with 20 nM tuftsin or pentapeptide. The eluate was concentrated and subjected to gel filtration; this yielded one major peak of [3H]tuftsin binding activity corresponding to approximately 500 kDa and a minor peak at approximately 250 kDa. Rechromatography of either peak resulted in the appearance of the same major and minor peaks. NaDodSO4/PAGE of the affinity-purified material under nonreducing conditions showed only two silver-staining bands. Electroblotting followed by [3H]tuftsin overlay and fluorography showed two adjacent radioactive bands corresponding in mobility to the silver-stained bands. Under reducing conditions, NaDodSO4/PAGE yielded molecular mass values 62 kDa and 52 kDa for the two tuftsin receptor subunits. Electron microscopy revealed a homogeneous population of spherical molecules with diameters of 104 A.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bump et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: