Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We evaluated the long-term outcome of 461 medial compartment knee arthroplasties operated at one orthopedic center from 1974 to 1993 through survivorship analysis. Prospective assessment was based on clinical examinations using a modified Bristol knee-scoring system and complete radiographical knee survey. 92% had good or excellent results on objective scoring, and range of motion averaged 112 degrees. 3 criteria were applied to indicate failure: 1) revision or recommended revision, 2) severe-to-moderate pain or revision, 3) lost to follow-up. 20 arthroplasties were revised or recommended to be revised at mean 5.5 years. The incidence of failure due to progression of arthrosis in the unreplaced compartment was low (< 2%). Loosening or wear occurred in 6 cases (1.5%), 2 of which developed fracture of implant. With revisions only as end-point to failure, the survival was 87% at 10 years (95% CI 81%-93%, effective number at risk = 133). In addition to revisions, 19 knees were considered to have failed, as moderate-to-severe pain was noted at follow-up and the survival was reduced to 74% at 10 years with pain or revision as endpoint (95% CI 65%-82%, effective number at risk = 105). We conclude that unicompartmental knee arthroplasty gives long-term pain relief in elderly patients with medial compartment arthrosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ansari et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: