The Rh1(diolefin)complexes [Rh(nbd)(2)][PF6] [Rh(1,5‐cod)(2)][PF6], and [Rh((Z)‐α ‐acetamidocinnamic acid)(2)][PF6] (2 = the chiral P,N‐ligand (S)‐1‐[bis(p‐methylphenyl)phospino]‐2‐[p‐methoxybenzyl)amino]‐3‐methylbutane have been prepared and characterized. These complexes exit as a mixture of isomers arising from different five‐membered‐ring conformations and diastereoisomers due to both the prochiral nitrogen and olefin ligands. The three‐dimensional solutions structures of these complexes have been studied with the specific aim of understanding how the chiral pocket is built. Aspects of the exchange dynamics and their possible relevance to homogeneous hydrogenation are discussed The solid‐state structure for the nbd complex, [Rh(nbd)(2)][PF6], as well as detailed one‐ and two‐dimensional 31P‐, 13C‐, and 1H‐NMR results are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berger et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: