Why the study?
Does high pressure affect performance differently in choking-resistant versus choking-susceptible athletes?
Does high pressure affect performance differently in choking-resistant versus choking-susceptible athletes?
Choking-resistant athletes improve under pressure by using task-focus and avoidance-cognitive coping, unlike choking-susceptible athletes who experience performance decrements.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports tailored coping approaches for athletes; extends observational choking evidence but leaves open causal benefits.
The current research provides an assessment of performance under pressure by deliberately investigating responses of athletes who are polar opposite. Forty-six female netball players were screened to sample choking-resistant and choking-susceptible athletes. The eight selected participants then completed 180 netball shots in a single-case A1-B-A2 design (A phases = low-pressure and B phase = high-pressure), with follow-up interviews. Under pressure, choking-resistant participants improved their performance by using task-focus and avoidance-cognitive coping, whereas choking-susceptible participants suffered from performance decrements often applying emotion-focused and approach-cognitive coping. Researchers should further explore the unique characteristics of choking-resistant athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mesagno et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: