Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the medical examiner setting, comprehensive drug screening is an essential analytical tool in the investigation of cause and manner of death.We have validated non-targeted and targeted screening assays for drugs and metabolites using ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) interfaced with mass spectrometry (MS) in single and tandem stages. For non-targeted screening by UPLC-MS electrospray interface, in-source fragmentation was used along with MS scanning (m/z 80-650) and library search for over 700 drug and metabolite analytes. Targeted detection of over 200 analytes by UPLC-MS-MS was performed with dual transition ion monitoring. Validation studies confirmed reproducibility of both mass spectra produced by in-source fragmentation and transition ion ratios by collision-cell dissociation. Lower limit of detection by UPLC-MS (10-150 ng/mL) and UPLC-MS-MS (1-50 ng/mL) was determined for a subset of drugs and correlated with extraction recovery and matrix effect. Drug findings by UPLC-MS and UPLC- MS-MS were compared with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) screening in postmortem blood from 410 medical examiner cases with 1121 positive drug findings by all methods. Accuracy, based on results of confirmation testing, was high (98-99%) across all screening assays and detection sensitivity by GC-MS (71%), UPLC-MS (73%), and UPLC-MS-MS (76%) was determined. UPLC-MS plus UPLC-MS-MS screening resulted in the highest drug detection rate (95%) and provided optimal dual-screening for the postmortem casework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosano et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: