Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We compare the Hartee-Fock (HF), Talman-Shadwick (TS), exact Slater (S), Slater Xα, and local-density (LD) schemes, and investigate how well the associated one-electron potentials describe electronic excitations. We discuss in some detail the role of self-interaction in the different schemes, and demonstrate that the Xα and LD schemes effectively represent ionic ( V N-1 ) potentials in the core region. In fact, for excited f electrons, the LDA is very similar to a relaxed HF average V N-1 potential with a 4 d core hole. Furthermore, we demonstrate how the self-interaction shifts of core levels arise because of incomplete local cancellation between the orbital-specific Hartree self-interaction and the average, orbital-independent exchange hole. The atomic dipole polarizability is introduced via the LS -dependent HF scheme and, in numerical applications to 4 d ionization of atomic Ba, we compare the effective HF 1 P V N-1 one-electron potential with the ionic HF av V N-1 and the neutral-atom HF V N potentials. We also compare it with the RPAE, with and without inclusion of relaxation, and demonstrate the effects of external screening by adding and removing electrons (Ba 1- - Ba 2+ ). Finally we motivate in some detail our opinion that the self-interaction in the LDA may be considered as simulating relaxation owing to a systematic partial cancellation between self-interaction and relaxation effects for outer and intermediate shells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crljen et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: