FTIR spectroscopy was used to quantitatively assess the secondary structure of proteins in aqueous−organic mixtures ranging from pure water to a pure solvent. For every such solution/suspension, the α-helix content of the protein was independently calculated from the amide I and amide III spectral regions (which gave essentially identical results). In all cases studied (two unrelated enzymic proteins lysozyme and subtilisin; three dissimilar water-miscible solvents acetonitrile, tetrahydrofuran, and 1-propanol), the protein secondary structure was much more native-like in pure organic solvents than in most water−solvent mixtures, e.g., 60% (v/v) organic solvents. In fact, placing lyophilized (or crystalline) proteins in the anhydrous solvents tested had no appreciable effect on the α-helix content, whereas the latter declined markedly in the 60% (v/v) solvents. This behavior was found to be kinetically controlled, i.e., to be due to inherent restrictions on protein conformational mobility in anhydrous, in contrast to aqueous−organic, media.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Griebenow et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: