Key result
Low-volume HIIT improves body composition and cardiovascular health in youth vs. inactive controls.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess the impact of low-volume high-intensity interval training on body composition and cardiovascular health in children and adolescents, while examining potential moderating factors.
Does low-volume high-intensity interval training (LV-HIIT) improve body composition and cardiovascular health in children and adolescents?
Meta-Analysis (n=996)
Does low-volume high-intensity interval training (LV-HIIT) improve body composition and cardiovascular health in children and adolescents?
Low-volume high-intensity interval training is a time-efficient strategy that effectively improves body composition and cardiovascular health in children and adolescents, with benefits comparable to moderate-intensity continuous training.
LV-HIIT offers a time-efficient option for youth cardiometabolic health; reinforces equivalence to MICT in Level 1 pediatric evidence.
Objectives This meta-analysis assessed the impact of low-volume high-intensity interval training (LV-HIIT) on body composition and cardiovascular health in children and adolescents, while examining potential moderating factors. Methods A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), and CNKI from inception to April 2025. A three-level random-effects model was used to estimate the overall effects, and subgroup analyses supplemented with meta-regression were performed to explore potential moderators and sources of heterogeneity. Results A total of 23 studies (996 participants, including 246 females) were included, with 6 studies on normal-weight and 17 on overweight/obese individuals. Compared with controls, low-volume high-intensity interval training (LV-HIIT) significantly reduced BMI (g = −1.24), fat mass (g = −0.99), body fat (g = −0.89), waistline (g = −0.42), weight (g = −0.34), and SBP (g = −0.37), while improving VO 2 max (g = 1.35). No significant differences were observed versus MICT. Subgroup and dose-response regressions suggested that weight status, age, intervention duration, training frequency, repetitions, and per-repetition time may alter the observed effects. Descriptive findings indicated comparable effects of LV-HIIT with small-sided games and sprint interval training but greater benefits over moderate-intensity interval training Conclusion LV-HIIT can effectively and time-efficiently improve body composition and cardiovascular health in children and adolescents, with overall effects comparable to MICT. Exercise prescriptions should carefully consider weight status, age, and intervention characteristics; however, given the limited number of studies and potential bias, the conclusions should be interpreted with caution. Limited descriptive comparisons indicate that LV-HIIT produces effects similar to SSG and SIT, and may offer greater benefits than MIIT. Systematic Review Registration https://osf.io/exhjm/ .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Healthy, overweight, or obese children and adolescents (n=996). Low-volume high-intensity interval training (LV-HIIT) vs. No-exercise control or moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) was evaluated on Overall body composition and cardiovascular health (SMD -0.39, 95% CI -0.66 to -0.12, p=<0.01). Low-volume high-intensity interval training significantly improved overall body composition and cardiovascular health (SMD -0.39) in children and adolescents compared to no-exercise controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: