Key result
Selective angiography through a cooled-tip radiofrequency ablation catheter was effective in 91.6% of patients undergoing ablation in aortic cusps, with no complications.
Why the study?
Does selective angiography through a cooled-tip radiofrequency catheter provide a feasible and safe alternative for mapping and ablation in the aortic cusps?
Observational (n=12)
Does selective angiography through a cooled-tip radiofrequency catheter provide a feasible and safe alternative for mapping and ablation in the aortic cusps?
Selective angiography through a cooled-tip radiofrequency ablation catheter is a feasible and safe method to assess the relation between the catheter tip and coronary ostia during aortic cusp ablation, avoiding the need for additional vascular access.
May simplify aortic cusp ablation without extra access; hypothesis-generating case report requiring prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Ablation in aortic cusps could be necessary in up to 15% of the patients, especially in para-Hisian atrial tachycardia and ventricular arrhythmias arising from outflow tracts. Risk of coronary damage has led to recommendation of systematic coronary angiography (CA) during the procedure. Other image tests as intravascular (ICE) or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) have been proposed. Both methods have limitations: additional vascular access for ICE and need for additional CA in some patients in case of TEE. We describe an alternative method to assess relation of catheter tip and coronary ostia during ablation in aortic cusps without additional vascular accesses by performing selective angiography with the ablation catheter. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively evaluated 12 consecutive patients (69.3 ± 8.5, 6 female) who underwent ablation in right (1), left (5), and noncoronary cusps (6). We performed angiography through the ablation cooled tip radiofrequency catheter at the ablation site. Ablation was effective in 91.6% of the patients (3 patients needed additional ablation out of coronary cusps: pulmonary cusp, right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), and coronary sinus and 1 patient underwent a second procedure because recurrence). No complications occurred neither during procedure nor follow-up (6.2 ± 3.8 months). No technical problems occurred with the ablation catheter after contrast injection. CONCLUSION: Selective angiography through a cooled-tip radiofrequency ablation catheter is feasible to assess relation of coronary ostia and ablation site when ablation in aortic cusps. It allows continuous real-time assessment of this relation, avoids the need for additional vascular accesses and no complications occurred in our series.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roca‐Luque et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Ablation in aortic cusps (n=12). Selective angiography through the ablation cooled tip radiofrequency catheter was evaluated on Ablation efficacy. Selective angiography through a cooled-tip radiofrequency ablation catheter was effective in 91.6% of patients undergoing ablation in aortic cusps, with no complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: