Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Immunoglobulin G antibody levels against Staphylococcus aureus peptidoglycan (PG) and crude staphylococcal antigen (SA) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and antistaphylolysin (ASTA) antibody levels by gel diffusion were determined in 53 patients with S. aureus and 54 patients with non-S. aureus endocarditis and septicemia as compared with 63 febrile control patients. The two ELISAs were the most sensitive assays indicating S. aureus endocarditis in 83% and 88% in the PG- and SA-assays, respectively. 39% of non-S. aureus endocarditis patients were positive in the PG-assay due to antibodies cross-reacting with streptococci. A 100% specificity for S. aureus infections was obtained with the ASTA test, but this assay was less sensitive. A significant rise in anti-PG or anti-SA antibody levels was not only seen among S. aureus infections but also in some streptococcal and S. epidermidis infections as well as in 3 febrile control patients. When at least 2 of the 3 assays showed positive peak antibody levels 1-4 weeks after onset of infection together with a significant rise of both anti-PG and anti-SA antibody levels the S. aureus endocarditis diagnosis was highly suggestive. Thus, we recommend the combined use of these 3 assays using paired serum samples in diagnosing serious S. aureus infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christensson et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: