Why the study?
What is the frequency of complications in patients on warfarin undergoing invasive procedures when therapy is interrupted versus continued?
What is the frequency of complications in patients on warfarin undergoing invasive procedures when therapy is interrupted versus continued?
Complications including embolic and bleeding events frequently occur in patients on warfarin undergoing invasive procedures regardless of whether therapy is interrupted or continued, highlighting the need for careful individualized management.
High reported complication rates occur with either warfarin strategy; leaves open optimal periprocedural management pending prospective trials.
Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the frequency and characteristics of complications in patients on anticoagulant therapy who were to undergo invasive procedure. Methods and Results: We sent a questionnaire to 2758 doctors who were on the mailing list of the Japanese Society of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology in August 2004. We received 614 questionnaires (response rate, 22.3%). Out of the 614 doctors, 19 (3.1%) reported that their patients had embolic events upon the interruption of warfarin therapy during dental extraction. In patients undergoing invasive procedures such as surgery, endoscopy, pacemaker implantation, and catheterization, 168 (27.4%) of the 614 doctors reported embolic events after the interruption of warfarin therapy. Further, 255 (41.5%) of the 614 doctors reported bleeding episodes when warfarin therapy was continued during the invasive procedures. Conclusion: Several complications of different types were reported to occur in patients receiving warfarin therapy who underwent elective invasive procedures, regardless of whether warfarin administration was interrupted or continued at the time of the invasive procedure. Therefore, it is necessary to make careful decisions about the management of patients on warfarin therapy who will be undergoing invasive procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: