Why the study?
Cancer clinical trials frequently exclude patients based on QTc prolongation thresholds due to arrhythmia risk, but the association between QT-prolonging drug prescriptions and trial eligibility in advanced cancer was unclear.
Does the prescription of QT-prolonging drugs increase QTc measurements and the odds of clinical trial exclusion in adults with advanced cancer?
Cohort (n=271)
No
Does the prescription of QT-prolonging drugs increase QTc measurements and the odds of clinical trial exclusion in adults with advanced cancer?
Prescription of QT-prolonging drugs in patients with advanced cancer is significantly associated with QTc prolongation, which may inadvertently exclude them from participating in oncology clinical trials.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May increase QTc-related trial exclusion risk in advanced cancer; hypothesis-generating for deprescribing to improve eligibility.
Introduction: Drug-induced prolongation of the heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) is associated with increased risk for the potentially fatal arrhythmia torsades de pointes. Due to arrhythmia risk, clinical trials with cancer therapeutics often exclude patients based on thresholds for QTc prolongation. Our objective was to assess associations between prescriptions for QT-prolonging drugs and the odds of meeting cancer trial exclusionary QTc thresholds in a cohort of adults with advanced cancer. Methods: Electronic health records were retrospectively reviewed for 271 patients seen at our institutional molecular solid tumor clinic. Collected data included demographics, QTc measurements, ventricular arrhythmia-related diagnoses, and all inpatient and outpatient prescriptions. Potential associations were assessed between demographic and clinical variables, including prescriptions for QT-prolonging drugs, and QTc measurements. In all patients, prescriptions for QT-prolonging drugs were associated with longer median and maximum QTc measurements at multiple assessed time points (i.e., for QT-prolonging drugs prescribed within 10, 30, 60, and 90 days of QTc measurements). Similarly, the number of QT-prolonging drugs prescribed was correlated with longer median and maximum QTc measurements at multiple time points. Common QTc-related exclusionary criteria were collected from a review of ClinicalTrials.gov for recent cancer clinical trials. Based on common exclusion criteria, prescriptions for QT-prolonging drugs increased the odds of trial exclusion. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that prescriptions for QT-prolonging drugs were associated with longer QTc measurements and increased odds of being excluded from cancer clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rowe et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Advanced cancer (n=271). QT-prolonging drugs vs. Non-QT-prolonging drugs or no drugs was evaluated on Maximum QTc > 450 ms (per additional QT-prolonging drug prescribed within 30 days) (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.6, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: