Key result
Metabolic syndrome was not consistently associated with incident cognitive decline across most cognitive domains in the majority of the reviewed longitudinal studies.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the association between metabolic syndrome and cognitive decline across distinct cognitive domains, complemented by a bibliometric analysis.
Is metabolic syndrome associated with incident cognitive decline across distinct cognitive domains?
Systematic Review (n=62,471)
Is metabolic syndrome associated with incident cognitive decline across distinct cognitive domains?
This systematic review found no consistent association between metabolic syndrome and incident cognitive decline across various cognitive domains, highlighting significant methodological heterogeneity in existing literature.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Metabolic syndrome should not prompt changes in cognitive monitoring; leaves open questions on methodological standardization across studies.
The aim of this review is to investigate the association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and cognitive decline in distinct cognitive domains, and to perform a complementary study description through the bibliometric analysis. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from inception to 15 December 2021 to identify longitudinal studies that examined the association of MetS with incident decline, in order to prevent reverse causality. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis checklist was used to conduct the present systematic review. Thirty studies were included and results were analyzed across the cognitive domains of global cognition, memory, executive functions, attention, visuoconstructive abilities, and language. The majority of the studies reviewed did not report statistically significant results for most cognitive domains investigated, and decline in specific cognitive domains was not consistently associated with the presence of MetS. Meta-analyses were not conducted due to the high degree of between-study heterogeneity regarding the MetS definitions, the cognitive domains examined, the specific tests used for each cognitive domain and the different measures of association used. Bibliometric analysis revealed that most studies are conducted by research teams from USA and China, and that cognitive tasks that reflect real-life abilities are rarely examined. Future studies should employ larger sample sizes, longer follow-up periods, a global consensus for MetS definition and standardized tests of the above mentioned cognitive domains as well as problem-solving tasks with high sensitivity and specificity to clarify the impact of MetS on cognition and its underlying mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koutsonida et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Metabolic syndrome and cognitive decline (n=62,471). Metabolic syndrome vs. Without metabolic syndrome was evaluated on Incident cognitive decline across distinct cognitive domains. Metabolic syndrome was not consistently associated with incident cognitive decline across most cognitive domains in the majority of the reviewed longitudinal studies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: