By using 193 nm laser photolysis and cavity ring-down spectroscopy to produce and monitor the propargyl radical (CH 2 CCH), the self-reaction and oxygen termolecular association rate coefficients for the propargyl radical were measured at 295 K between total pressures of 300 Pa and 13300 Pa (2.25 and 100 Torr) in Ar, He, and N 2 buffer gases. The rate coefficients obtained by simple second-order fits to the decay data were observed to vary with the photolytic precursors: allene, propargyl chloride, and propargyl bromide. By using a numerical fitting routine and more comprehensive mechanisms, a distinct rate coefficient for the self-reaction was determined, k ∞ (C 3 H 3 +C 3 H 3 ) = (4.3 ± 0.6) × 10 -11 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1 at 295 K. This rate coefficient, which is a factor of 2.8 times slower than reported previously, was independent of total pressure and buffer choice over the entire pressure range. Other rate coefficients derived during the modeling included k (C 3 H 3 +H 665 Pa He) = (2.5 ± 1.1) × 10 -10 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1, k (C 3 H 3 +C 3 H 3 Cl 2 ) = (7 ± 4) × 10 -11 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1, and k (C 3 H 3 +C 3 H 3 Br 2 ) = (2.4 ± 2) × 10 -11 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1 . The association reaction C 3 H 3 + O 2 was found to lie in the falloff region between linear and saturated pressure dependence for each buffer gas (Ar, He, and N 2 ) between 300 Pa and 13300 Pa. A fit of these data derived the high-pressure limiting rate coefficient k ∞ (C 3 H 3 +O 2 ) = (2.3 ± 0.5) × 10 -13 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1 . Three measurements of the propargyl radical absorption cross-section obtained σ 332.5 = (413 ± 60) × 10 -20 cm 2 molecule -1 at 332.5 nm. Stated uncertainties are two standard deviations and include the uncertainty of the absorption cross section, where appropriate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atkinson et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: