In the system CuCN–KCN–H2O, we have observed infrared absorption spectra of three distinct complex ions: Cu(CN)2−,ε=165±25 mole−1 liter cm−1 at 2125 cm−1;Cu(CN)3=,ε=1090±10 mole−1 liter cm−1 at 2094 cm−1;andCu(CN)4≡,ε=1657±15 mole−1 liter cm−1 at 2076 cm−1.At 29°C, the constants for the dissociation of Cu(CN)4≡ into Cu(CN)3=+CN— are: K4, 3c = 0.0076±0.0005 mole liter—1 [in terms of concentrations at 0.1—0.2f Cu(I)] and K4, 3a = 0.026 mole liter—1 (in terms of activities). Analogous values for the dissociation of Cu(CN)3= into Cu(CN)2—+CN— are K3, 2c = (2.44±0.36)×10—5 mole liter—1, and K3, 2a = 4.2×10—5. The above values are calculated from approximately 100 determinations. At 25°C, the corresponding values of these constants are approximately K4, 3c = 0.0057 and K3, 2c = 1.5×10—5. Using the activity constants determined in this paper and a value of 1×10—24 for the constant: [Cu+][CN—]2/[Cu(CN)2—] we derive the following values: [Cu+][CN—]3/[Cu(CN)3=] = 2.6×10—29 and [Cu+][CN—]4/[Cu(CN)4≡] = 5×10—31. The free energies of formation of the complex ions are thus: Cu(CN)2—, ΔFf0 = 58.5 kcal/mole; Cu(CN)3=, ΔFf0 = 91.8 kcal/mole; and Cu(CN)4≡, ΔFf0 = 129 kcal/mole.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Penneman et al. (1956) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: