Rater reliability was evaluated for the system most widely used to assess copy and recall of the Rey Complex Figure: the Osterrieth (1944) 18-item scoring system. The study sample consisted of 95 subjects (49 males, 46 females), most of whom were elderly individuals (M = 59.83, SD = 15.21 years) suffering from memory impairment. Four raters rated copy and delayed-recall protocols, and three raters re-rated the protocols after an interval of 3 months. Results revealed excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability coefficients (.85-.97) for total scores. However, reliabilities for the 18 individual items ranged from poor (.14) to excellent (.96). Differences in both reliability and level of subject performance were observed as a function of item and conditions of copy versus recall. It is concluded that the Osterrieth scoring system supports excellent reliability in use with memory-impaired patients using total scores. Nevertheless, individual-item reliability would benefit from enhancement, for example, via amplified delineation of relevant decision criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tupler et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: