Key result
In patients with non-ST elevation ACS managed with an early invasive strategy, elderly patients had significantly higher overall mortality compared to younger patients (9.4% vs 2.1%, p<0.001).
Why the study?
Does an early invasive strategy have different outcomes in elderly versus younger patients with non-ST elevation ACS?
Cohort (n=439)
Does an early invasive strategy have different outcomes in elderly versus younger patients with non-ST elevation ACS?
An early invasive strategy in elderly patients with NSTE-ACS is feasible and leads to high rates of revascularization, though with expectedly higher mortality compared to younger patients, particularly among those undergoing CABG.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mortality differences by age in invasively managed NSTE-ACS warrant cautious patient selection; leaves open comparative effectiveness versus conservative strategies in the elderly.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate an early invasive strategy in elderly patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: All consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of non-ST elevation ACS from June 2002 to February 2004 were enrolled in this registry. Clinical outcome was assessed at 30 days and in long term follow up. RESULTS: An early invasive strategy was followed for 439 patients, of whom 159 (36%) were elderly and had a higher clinical risk profile and greater extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) than the younger patients. Coronary revascularisation was conducted in 133 (83%) elderly patients and 239 (85%) younger patients (not significant). At a mean (SD) follow up time of 10.7 (5.2) months overall mortality, cardiac death, and death plus myocardial infarction were significantly higher among elderly patients than among younger patients (9.4% v 2.1%, p < 0.001; 6.8% v 1.8%, p < 0.01; 11.3% v 5%, p = 0.02, respectively). The significant difference in cardiac death between the two groups was related more to elderly patients being treated by coronary artery bypass grafting (19.3% v 4.9%, p = 0.05) than by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (2.9% v 1.1%, p = 0.3). Cox regression analysis showed age, serum creatinine > 115 micromol/l, no previous history of CAD, left ventricular ejection fraction > 45%, and the absence of diabetes to be independent predictors of the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: In unselected elderly patients presenting with non-ST elevation ACS an early invasive strategy is feasible and leads to coronary revascularisation in the majority of cases, resulting in encouraging immediate and long term clinical results, particularly among PCI treated patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Francesco Liïstro (2005) conducted a cohort in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n=439). Elderly age vs. Younger age was evaluated on Overall mortality (p=< 0.001). In patients with non-ST elevation ACS managed with an early invasive strategy, elderly patients had significantly higher overall mortality compared to younger patients (9.4% vs 2.1%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: