Key result
Patients with re-rupture after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair demonstrated significantly lower shoulder flexion (125.5 vs 161.4 degrees, p=0.01) and abduction at 24 months compared to controls.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess the 2-year prognosis of rotator cuff tears after ARCR, compare outcomes between patients with and without re-rupture, and evaluate the usefulness of the Shoulder36 self-assessment tool.
Does re-rupture after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair worsen long-term physical function and patient-reported outcomes compared to no re-rupture?
Cohort (n=28)
No
Does re-rupture after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair worsen long-term physical function and patient-reported outcomes compared to no re-rupture?
Patients with re-rupture after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair have reduced range of motion compared to those without re-rupture at 2 years, but maintain similar improvements in pain and activities of daily living.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Re-rupture after repair is associated with reduced long-term ROM; leaves open effects on function and revision needs.
[Purpose] We followed-up patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) for 2 years to assess the prognosis of rotator cuff tears and compared the outcomes of the patients with and without re-rupture. We also examined the usefulness of Shoulder36, a self-assessment tool, for assessing the long-term prognosis in patients undergoing ARCR. [Participants and Methods] We included 28 patients who received occupational therapy pre- and post-ARCR between April 2012 and August 2015 and categorized them based on the occurrence of re-rupture. We followed-up on their prognoses for 2 years using physical examination and Shoulder36 assessment. [Results] Re-rupture occurred in five patients within 3 months of treatment. During the 2 year follow-up, the control group showed a significant improvement in pain and bi-directional active range of motion during physical assessment and in five out of six domains during Shoulder36 assessment. In contrast, the re-rupture group showed significant differences for only three domains of the Shoulder36 assessment twelve months after surgery. [Conclusion] We confirmed the long-term functional improvement and maintenance in the re-rupture group, suggesting that continued rehabilitation, compensatory movements, and detailed guidance on daily life activities are required for patients after ARCR. Furthermore, Shoulder36 can be useful for assessing the prognosis of patients with and without re-rupture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saito et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Rotator cuff tear (post-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair) (n=28). Re-rupture after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair vs. No re-rupture (control) was evaluated on Shoulder flexion at 24 months (p=0.01). Patients with re-rupture after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair demonstrated significantly lower shoulder flexion (125.5 vs 161.4 degrees, p=0.01) and abduction at 24 months compared to controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: