Recent advances in optimal control theory and computation are used to develop minimum-time solutions for the rest-to-rest reorientation of a generic rigid body. It is shown that the differences in the geometry of the inertia ellipsoid and the control space lead to counterintuitive noneigenaxis maneuvers. The optimality of the open-loop solutions are verified by an application of Pontryagin's principle as a necessary condition and not as a problem-solving tool. It is shown that the nonsmoothness of the lower Hamiltonian compounds the curse of dimensionality associated in solving the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations for feedback solutions. These difficulties are circumvented by generating Caratheodory-π trajectories, which are based on the fundamental notion that a closed loop does not necessarily imply closed-form solutions. While demonstrating the successful implementation of the proposed method for practical applications, these closed-loop results reveal yet another counterintuitive phenomenon: a suggestion that parameter uncertainties may aid the optimality of the maneuver rather than hinder it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fleming et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: