Key result
Women whose initial VTE was associated with hormone use had a 29% lower risk of VTE recurrence compared to non-users with unprovoked VTE (adjusted HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.58-0.88).
Why the study?
Does having a hormone-related initial VTE event reduce the risk of VTE recurrence compared to an unprovoked event in women?
Cohort (n=4,170)
Yes
Does having a hormone-related initial VTE event reduce the risk of VTE recurrence compared to an unprovoked event in women?
Women with a hormone-associated first VTE have a significantly lower risk of recurrence compared to those with unprovoked VTE, suggesting prolonged anticoagulation may be unjustified in this group.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support refined recurrence risk estimates in women with VTE; leaves open optimal anticoagulation duration pending prospective trials.
It is vital to identify people with low recurrence risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) so as to protect them from dangers of prolonged anticoagulation therapy. Among women who develop VTE following hormone use, the evidence as to whether their risk of recurrence is low if they cease this therapy is conflicting. We investigated whether women whose initial VTE event was hormone-related have a lower risk of VTE recurrence than women whose initial event had no obvious cause (unprovoked). A cohort study utilising the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics data from England was conducted. We selected 4170 women aged between 15 and 64 years who were diagnosed with a first VTE event between 1997 and 2011. Cox regression models were used to obtain hazard ratios (HR). Hormone users had 29% lower recurrence risk than non-users (adjusted HR = 0·71; 95% confidence interval 0·58-0·88), a relationship which existed both in women aged 15-44 years (predominantly oral contraceptive users) and those aged 45-64 years (predominantly hormone replacement therapy users). In conclusion, having a hormone-associated VTE is associated with a lower recurrence risk than one that is unprovoked after discontinuation of the hormone-containing preparation. Prolonged anticoagulation may therefore be unjustified in such women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kiconco et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Venous thromboembolism (VTE) (n=4,170). Hormone use (hormone-related VTE) vs. Non-users (unprovoked VTE) was evaluated on VTE recurrence (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58-0.88). Women whose initial VTE was associated with hormone use had a 29% lower risk of VTE recurrence compared to non-users with unprovoked VTE (adjusted HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.58-0.88).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: