Key result
Spinal cord stimulation resulted in a 52.3% regression of pain on the visual analog scale over a mean follow-up of 7.33 years in patients with refractory angina pectoris (P=0.0025).
Why the study?
Refractory angina pectoris significantly reduces length and quality of life, prompting evaluation of spinal cord stimulation for controlling anginal pain over a long-term follow-up (>7 years).
Does spinal cord stimulation improve anginal pain and quality of life in patients with refractory angina pectoris?
Observational (n=9)
Does spinal cord stimulation improve anginal pain and quality of life in patients with refractory angina pectoris?
p-value: p=0.0025
Spinal cord stimulation may provide significant long-term reduction in anginal pain for patients with refractory angina pectoris.
May support long-term pain relief in refractory angina; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Background: Refractory angina pectoris significantly reduces the length and quality of life. One of the methods to control symptoms and improve the quality of life of patients with refractory angina pectoris is spinal cord stimulation.Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in controlling anginal pain in the long-term period over a long follow-up (>7 years).Methods: We retrospectively studied treatment results of 9 patients (6 men and 3 women) in the long-term follow-up from October 2012 to November 2022. Anginal pain and patients' quality of life were assessed using the visual analog scale and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, respectively.Results: The mean follow-up was 7.33 ± 1.11 years. In the long-term postoperative period, regression of pain according to the visual analog scale was 52.3% (P = .0025). The Seattle Angina Questionnaire showed an improvement of the quality of life by 52.2% (P = .0993).Conclusion: Spinal cord stimulation allows to make control of chronic anginal pain more efficient, improve patients’ length and quality of life, and reduce the frequency and severity of disability. Received 8 December 2022. Revised 17 July 2023. Accepted 18 July 2023. Informed consent: The patient’s informed consent to use the records for medical purposes is obtained. Funding: The study did not have sponsorship. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Contribution of the authors: The authors contributed equally to this article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duse et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Refractory angina pectoris (n=9). Spinal cord stimulation was evaluated on Anginal pain assessed using the visual analog scale (p=0.0025). Spinal cord stimulation resulted in a 52.3% regression of pain on the visual analog scale over a mean follow-up of 7.33 years in patients with refractory angina pectoris (P=0.0025).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: