Key result
Health-promoting lifestyle training significantly improved health-related hardiness (mean 54.45) and hope (mean 23.40) in patients with cardiovascular diseases compared to control (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Patients with cardiovascular diseases face psychological problems reducing their control over the disease, prompting investigation into whether health-promoting lifestyle training improves health-related hardiness and hope.
Does health-promoting lifestyle training improve health-related hardiness and hope in patients with cardiovascular diseases?
RCT (n=40)
randomly assigned
No
Does health-promoting lifestyle training improve health-related hardiness and hope in patients with cardiovascular diseases?
p-value: p=<0.001
Health-promoting lifestyle training significantly improves health-related hardiness and hope in patients with cardiovascular diseases.
Health-promoting lifestyle training improves hardiness and hope in CVD; supports routine integration and larger outcome trials.
Background: In addition to physical problems, patients with cardiovascular diseases face psychological problems that reduce their control over the disease. The present study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of health-promoting lifestyle (HPL) training on health-related hardiness and hope of patients with cardiovascular diseases in Ahvaz, Iran. Methods: This was a quasi-experiment study with a pre-test-post-test control group design. The statistical population included all patients with cardiovascular disease who were referred to Golestan Educational and Therapeutic Hospital affiliated with the Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Iran, in the winter of 2021-2022. The research sample included 40 participants who were selected after examining the inclusion criteria of the research through convenience sampling. The subjects were randomly assigned into the experimental and control groups (n=20). The experimental group underwent eight 90-minute sessions of HPL training. During this time, the control group received no training. The research instruments included the demographic information form, the Revised Health Hardiness Inventory (RHHI-24), and the Adult Hope Scale (AHS). The data were analyzed using the multivariable analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) by SPSS software, version 19 at a significance level of 0.05. Results: The Mean±SD of the post-test scores of health-related hardiness and hope in the experimental group were 54.45±6.68 and 23.40±3.63, respectively, which was significantly different from the pre-test scores (P<0.001). The experimental and control group had a significant difference regarding health-related hardiness and hope (P<0.001). Conclusion: Health specialists are recommended to utilize HPL training together with other training methods to improve health-related hardiness and hope of patients with cardiovascular diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kiani et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Cardiovascular diseases (n=40). Health-promoting lifestyle (HPL) training vs. no training was evaluated on health-related hardiness and hope (p=<0.001). Health-promoting lifestyle training significantly improved health-related hardiness (mean 54.45) and hope (mean 23.40) in patients with cardiovascular diseases compared to control (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: