Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
During a 14-month period weekly observations were made of the social behavior of a deer herd containing 10% male deer suffering from hypogonadism. Social relationships were divided into two categories: those relationships affected by sexual activities of normal deer and those not so affected. Definite social hierarchy was evident on feeding grounds and was based on frequent aggressive-submissive interactions. Aggression was much more pronounced during the period of sexual activity which coincided with the period of maximum food shortage. Normal males used a sequential pattern of aggressive threats which included the “ear-drop,” the “hard look,” the “sidle,” the “head threat” and the “rush.” Females also used a sequential pattern of threat postures and action similar to that of males, except that a “strike” and “flailing” with the front feet replaced the threats with antlers employed by males. “Velvet-horns” or hypogona-dals were inferior in the “peck order” to all normal deer. Normal males, especially during rut, were more aggressive toward “velvet-horns” than toward any other deer. Normal deer used a sequential pattern of alarm behavior: “stamping” with the front feet, “snorting,” “whistling” and flight with erection of the tail. “Velvet-horns” did not employ any of these alarm actions but merely fled from danger.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (1965) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: