Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) was performed on monolayers prepared by scribing silicon under a homologous series of 1-alkenes, 1-alkynes, and 1-haloalkanes: CH 2 CH(CH 2 ) n CH 3 ( n = 2, 5, 9), HC⋮C(CH 2 ) n CH 3 ( n = 2, 5, 9), Cl(CH 2 ) n CH 3 ( n = 4, 7, 9), Br(CH 2 ) n CH 3 ( n = 4, 7, 11), I(CH 2 ) n CH 3 ( n = 0, 1, 2, 4, 7, 11), and I 13 CH 3 . Numerous SiC x H y + and C x H y + fragments and adduct ions were observed. The results support a proposed binding model that 1-haloalkanes bind to the silicon surface through one C−Si bond and that 1-alkenes and 1-alkynes generally bind through two C−Si bonds. For instance, silicon surfaces scribed under 1-haloalkanes show less carbon by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) than silicon scribed under 1-alkenes and 1-alkynes with the same number of carbon atoms, but they show more intense SiC x H y + fragments by ToF-SIMS. Above a certain chain length, the relative intensities of the fragment and adduct ions for a homologous series generally increase with increasing alkyl chain length, which is in agreement with carbon surface coverages measured by XPS and the proposed binding models. Anomalously strong SiCH 3 + and SiC 2 H 5 + fragments observed in silicon scribed under CH 3 I and CH 3 CH 2 I suggest formation of methyl- and ethyl-terminated silicon, respectively. An isotopic study of silicon scribed under 13 CH 3 I and CH 3 I provides additional evidence for formation of methyl-terminated silicon and suggests sputter-induced decomposition of the near-surface region by ToF-SIMS. Ab initio calculations of a few SiC x H y + type fragments are shown to verify assignments of structure. We also note an alternative explanation for some of the results based on the density of alkyl chains on the surfaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lua et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: