Key result
Surgical risk scores including Euroscore II, STS, and Logistic Euroscore predicted postoperative atrial fibrillation, with Euroscore II demonstrating the highest area under the curve (0.697).
Why the study?
The predictive ability of surgical risk scores including Euroscore II, STS, and Logistic Euroscore for postoperative atrial fibrillation needed to be compared.
Do surgical risk scores (Euroscore II, STS, Logistic Euroscore) predict postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing isolated CABG?
Cohort (n=104)
Yes
Do surgical risk scores (Euroscore II, STS, Logistic Euroscore) predict postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing isolated CABG?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.697
p-value: p=0.005
Euroscore II may be a better tool than STS and Logistic Euroscore for predicting postoperative atrial fibrillation following isolated CABG.
OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical risk scores including Euroscore II, STS and Logistic Euroscore for their predictive ability about postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Istanbul Yeni Yuzyil University, Gaziosmanpasa Hospital and Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Center, from June to December 2018. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and four patients, undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting operation, were enrolled. Surgical risk scores, clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic parameters were compared between POAF-positive and POAF-negative groups Results: Of the 104 patients included, 23 (22.1%) patients developed atrial fibrillation postoperatively. Peripheral artery disease, carotid artery disease, current smoking, cardiopulmonary bypass time, left atrial diameter, and Syntax II score were found to be associated with POAF. Among these, peripheral artery disease and cardiopulmonary bypass time were independently related with POAF. Euroscore II (p = 0.005), STS (p = 0.026) and Logistic Euroscore (p = 0.032) were all statistically higher in POAF developing patients. In terms of ROC analysis, area under the curve was higher in Euroscore II (0.697) than STS and Logistic Euroscore (0.658 and 0.652, respectively). CONCLUSION: Euroscore II, STS and Logistic Euroscore were all associated with POAF development. However, Euroscore II could be a better option for the prediction of POAF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doğan et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease undergoing isolated CABG (n=104). Surgical risk scores (Euroscore II, STS, Logistic Euroscore) was evaluated on postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) (AUC 0.697, p=0.005). Surgical risk scores including Euroscore II, STS, and Logistic Euroscore predicted postoperative atrial fibrillation, with Euroscore II demonstrating the highest area under the curve (0.697).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: