Key result
Cardiac computed tomography angiography for LAA sizing correlates with CCA and ICE but yields slightly larger diameters, reducing the risk of high-flow leaks and device malposition due to undersizing.
Why the study?
Does CCTA compared to TEE, ICE, and CCA improve the correct selection of device size and reduce residual leaks in patients undergoing LAAO with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug?
Observational (n=66)
No
Does CCTA compared to TEE, ICE, and CCA improve the correct selection of device size and reduce residual leaks in patients undergoing LAAO with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug?
CCTA is a superior imaging modality for sizing the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug during LAAO, as it avoids the undersizing commonly seen with TEE and reduces the risk of high-flow leaks and device malposition.
May support CCTA-guided sizing to avoid undersizing in LAAO; leaves open randomized confirmation versus TEE for leak reduction.
AIMS: Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) emerged as a valid alternative in patients with a formal contraindication to oral anticoagulant therapy. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE), cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA), intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), and conventional cardiac angiography (CCA) are used to evaluate LAA diameters. The aim of our study was to compare pre- and intraprocedural imaging techniques in determining the correct selection of the device size, with a retrospective evaluation of the results obtained at post-procedural CCTA follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between September 2009 and July 2013, 66 consecutive patients underwent to LAAO with the ACP at our institution. Preoperative LAA evaluation was realized with TEE, CCTA, ICE, and CCA. Fifty-eight (58) patients underwent to post-procedural CCTA to confirm the LAA complete exclusion, the number and extent of the residual leaks, and the positioning of the device. LAA diameters measured by CCTA correlate with the diameters obtained with CCA and ICE, but they are sized slightly larger than the others. TEE has a lower correlation with every other imaging method and a likely tendency to underestimate. The distribution of the leaks and the positioning of the device in post-procedural CCTA show no substantial differences between the devices used greater or equal to the one selected with CCTA in terms of LAA exclusion. CONCLUSION: The sizing of the device decided using CCTA in the phase of maximum LAA expansion reduces the risk of high-flow leaks and device malposition due to undersizing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clemente et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Contraindication to oral anticoagulant therapy requiring LAAO (n=66). Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) vs. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE), intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), and conventional cardiac angiography (CCA) was evaluated on LAA diameter measurement and correct selection of device size. Cardiac computed tomography angiography for LAA sizing correlates with CCA and ICE but yields slightly larger diameters, reducing the risk of high-flow leaks and device malposition due to undersizing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: