Key result
Discordant ASA classification between surgeons and anesthesiologists was associated with a significantly higher risk of 30-day mortality (OR 2.00) compared to concordant classification.
Why the study?
Prior studies using hypothetical scenarios showed poor ASA classification concordance among healthcare providers, but clinical data and evaluations of associated factors or patient outcomes were lacking.
Does discordant ASA classification between surgeons and anesthesiologists correlate with adverse patient outcomes in adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery?
Cohort (n=46,284)
No
Does discordant ASA classification between surgeons and anesthesiologists correlate with adverse patient outcomes in adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Discordant ASA classification between surgeons and anesthesiologists is associated with higher risks of 30-day mortality, 1-year mortality, and prolonged ICU admission, highlighting the need for standardized scoring.
The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA) is used for communication of patient health status, risk scoring, benchmarking and financial claims. Prior studies using hypothetical scenarios have shown poor concordance of ASA classification among healthcare providers. There is a paucity of studies using clinical data, and of clinical factors or patient outcomes associated with discordant classification. The study aims to assess ASA classification concordance between surgeons and anesthesiologists, factors surrounding discordance and its impact on patient outcomes. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary medical center on 46284 consecutive patients undergoing elective surgery between January 2017 and December 2019. The ASA class showed moderate concordance (weighted Cohen’s 𝜅 0.53) between surgeons and anesthesiologists. We found significant associations between discordant classification and patient comorbidities, age and race. Patients with discordant classification had a higher risk of 30-day mortality (odds ratio (OR) 2.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.52-2.62, p<0.0001), 1-year mortality (OR 1.53, 95% CI = 1.38-1.69, p < 0.0001), and Intensive Care Unit admission >24 hours (OR 1.69, 95% CI = 1.47-1.94, p< 0.0001). Hence, there is a need for improved standardization of ASA scoring and cross-specialty review in ASA-discordant cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwa et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Elective surgery (n=46,284). Discordant ASA classification vs. Concordant ASA classification was evaluated on 30-day mortality (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.52-2.62, p=<0.0001). Discordant ASA classification between surgeons and anesthesiologists was associated with a significantly higher risk of 30-day mortality (OR 2.00) compared to concordant classification.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: