Two‐dimensional (2D) and three‐dimensional (3D) quasiclassical trajectory calculations on H + Br2 at 300°K and H + HBr at 1000°K are reported. Angular scattering, energy disposal, and impact parameter distributions for reactive collisions are compared after removal of phase‐space factors (dimensionality bias) as a means of examining the similarities and differences in the dynamic bias in 2D and 3D. Qualitatively, for all reactive processes studied, the 3D trajectory calculated distributions are reproduced by the phase‐space adjusted 2D trajectory data. Thus the surprisal of these angular scattering, energy disposal, and impact parameter distributions is dimensionally invariant, and the same dynamic bias appears in 2D and 3D. A systematic method for converting 2D reaction probabilities and maximum reactive impact parameters into 3D rate coefficients is presented. We find that trajectory calculated 3D rate coefficients may in general differ markedly from those derived from 2D trajectory data. In particular, the surprisal associated with rate coefficients depends on dimensionality for the H + HBr → H2 + Br reaction, but is invariant for the H′ + HBr → H′Br + Br and H + Br2 → HBr + Br reactions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pace et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: