This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background Direct‐seeded rice is popular for saving labor, simplifying cultivation, and reducing costs, but it involves new challenges of shallow root systems and short growth periods that require optimizing the time, frequency and proportion of nitrogen (N) fertilizer application. Field experiments with five different fertilizer ratios of basal, tillering and panicle fertilizer, namely N 180‐0‐0 , N 90‐90–0 , N 54‐126‐0 , N 54‐72‐54 and N 0‐90‐90 , were conducted to investigate the effects of different N fertilizer management protocols on yield formation, N uptakes, utilization and N loss from paddy fields in direct‐seeded rice. Results Optimizing the N fertilizer application protocol (N 54‐72‐54 ) for direct‐seeded rice produced significantly higher yield by 13.3%, N accumulation by 33.4%, and N recovery efficiency by 50.7% compared to excessive basal N (N 180‐0‐0 ). Excessive basal N (N 180‐0‐0 ) reduced seedling emergence and tiller formation by 28.6% and 42.5%, respectively. Excessive spike N (N 0‐90‐90 ) decreased root length, root volume, and N metabolism enzymes at the tillering stages, increased SPAD (soil plant analysis development) values and leaf area at the filling stages but reduced filled grain rate by 7.7%. Optimizing the N application protocol (N 54‐72‐54 ) reduced ammonia (NH 3 ) volatilization by 18.6% and runoff N losses by 13.1%. Conclusion Optimizing the N fertilization application protocol significantly increased rice seedling emergence rate and tiller number, improved root morphology and enhanced N metabolism enzyme activities, Increased SPAD value and leaf area index, and reduces N losses (NH 3 volatilization and runoff losses). The optimal N fertilizer application protocol for direct seeded rice was N 54‐72‐54 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: