The influence of trace elements on the prevalence of caries is a confused subject. However, sufficient evidence has been ac-cumulated to suggest that it is a subject that justifies a continuing and expanding research effort. The conclusive demonstra-tion of the inverse relationship between caries prevalence and fluoride (F) intake at once indicates the potential effect of a trace element on caries and makes it un-necessary to deal with F in this report. If the epidemiologic studies of Arnold' are examined it can be seen that in addition to lower caries prevalence in localities with optimal levels of F in water, there were also substantial differences in caries preva-lence between localities where the F con-tents of the waters were low and of the same level. For instance, in Clarksville (Tenn) with 0.2 ppm F in the water, the mean number of DMFT in 12- to 14-year-old children was 4.58; whereas in Key West (Fla) with 0.1 ppm F in water the mean number of DMFT per child was 10.70. Several other examples of this sort appear in Arnold's ' studies. Similar examples can be cited from the classic studies of Ock-erse2 in South Africa which also show that there were large unexplained differences in caries prevalence between localities where low F waters were used. These and other substantial differences in caries prevalence between comparable populations that can-not be explained on the basis of F intake may have a variety of causes, but evidence is available that suggests that variations in the intake of trace elements other than fluoride, in food or water, may be impli-cated. This paper will consider briefly the dif-ferences that may occur in the trace ele-ment content of foods and water and the way in which these may influence trace element intake by man, the results of some investigations that indicate a potential rela-tionship between the intake of particular trace elements and the prevalence of caries in man or experimental animals, and the mechanisms by which trace elements may influence susceptibility to caries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Losee et al. (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: