Why the study?
Although GLP-1 RAs have been associated with potential reductions in VTE risk, evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of tirzepatide on VTE risk in patients with obesity remains limited.
Does tirzepatide reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism in adults with obesity compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists?
Population
701,374 matched adults with obesity
Comparison
Tirzepatide vs GLP-1 RAs
Design
Retrospective, active-comparator, new-user propensity-matched cohort study
Follow-up
1-year
Key result
Tirzepatide initiation was associated with a significantly lower 1-year risk of venous thromboembolism compared with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with obesity (HR 0.90).
Authors
Loading...
Should not yet change prescribing; leaves open whether tirzepatide reduces VTE versus GLP-1 RAs in randomized trials.
Cohort (n=701,374)
Yes
Does tirzepatide reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism in adults with obesity compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists?
Hazard Ratio: 0.9 (95% CI 0.83–0.98)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.3% vs 0.4%
p-value: p=0.011
In adults with obesity, tirzepatide initiation was associated with a significantly lower 1-year risk of venous thromboembolism compared with GLP-1 receptor agonists, driven by reductions in pulmonary embolism and all-cause mortality.
Wu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Obesity (n=701,374). Tirzepatide vs. GLP-1 receptor agonists was evaluated on 1-year incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.98, p=0.011). Tirzepatide initiation was associated with a significantly lower 1-year risk of venous thromboembolism compared with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with obesity (HR 0.90).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: