Key result
Tirzepatide is linked to ~10% lower 1-year VTE risk vs GLP-1 RAs in obesity.
Why the study?
Although GLP-1 RAs have been associated with potential reductions in VTE risk, evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of tirzepatide on VTE risk in patients with obesity remains limited.
Does tirzepatide reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism in adults with obesity compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists?
Cohort (n=701,374)
Yes
Does tirzepatide reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism in adults with obesity compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In adults with obesity, tirzepatide initiation was associated with a significantly lower 1-year risk of venous thromboembolism compared with GLP-1 receptor agonists, driven by reductions in pulmonary embolism and all-cause mortality.
Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with obesity. Although glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have been associated with weight loss and potential reductions in VTE risk, evidence regarding tirzepatide remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of tirzepatide versus GLP-1 RAs in reducing the risk of VTE in patients with obesity. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX global federated health research network. Adults with obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 or ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes) who initiated tirzepatide or GLP-1 RAs between January 2022 and August 2025 were identified. An active-comparator, new-user design was applied. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to balance baseline demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory parameters. The primary outcome was 1-year incidence of VTE; secondary outcomes included PE, DVT, and all-cause mortality. Negative control outcomes and E-values were used to assess residual confounding. Results After matching, 701,374 patients were included. Tirzepatide initiation was associated with a significantly lower risk of VTE compared with GLP-1 RAs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83–0.98; p = 0.011). The benefit was driven by reductions in PE (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79–0.98; p = 0.021) and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82–0.99; p = 0.024), whereas no significant difference was observed for DVT (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.86–1.07; p = 0.410). Conclusion In this large real-world cohort, tirzepatide use was associated with a significantly lower 1-year incidence of VTE compared with GLP-1 RAs in patients with obesity, particularly through reductions in PE and all-cause mortality. These findings suggest an association between tirzepatide use and a lower risk of VTE compared with GLP-1 receptor agonists. However, given the observational nature of this study, causality cannot be established, and the results should be considered hypothesis-generating.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Obesity (n=701,374). Tirzepatide vs. GLP-1 receptor agonists was evaluated on 1-year incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.98, p=0.011). Tirzepatide initiation was associated with a lower 1-year risk of venous thromboembolism compared with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with obesity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: