Key result
Intravenous isradipine produced a significantly greater reduction in resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to nifedipine in patients with stable coronary heart disease.
Why the study?
Does intravenous isradipine improve hemodynamic parameters compared to nifedipine in patients with stable coronary heart disease?
RCT
Open-label
Randomized
Does intravenous isradipine improve hemodynamic parameters compared to nifedipine in patients with stable coronary heart disease?
Intravenous isradipine provides greater blood pressure reduction than nifedipine in patients with stable coronary heart disease, though neither significantly improves exercise-induced ST depression.
May inform acute BP management favoring isradipine over nifedipine in stable CHD; extends head-to-head RCT data on dihydropyridines.
In an open randomized study, hemodynamic and antianginal effects of nifedipine and the new dihydropyridine derivative isradipine were compared in patients with stable, angiographically confirmed coronary heart disease. Right heart hemodynamics, systemic arterial blood pressure, ECG, and drug plasma concentrations were measured before medication at rest and exercise, after infusions of increasing doses at rest, and again after treatment at rest and exercise. A linear relationship between serum concentrations and cumulated dosages was obtained for both drugs. At rest, both drugs significantly increased cardiac output and heart rate. The reduction of arterial blood pressure was significantly greater after isradipine (systolic from 148 +/- 3 to 104 +/- 3 mmHg; diastolic from 90 +/- 4 to 58 +/- 2 mmHg) than after nifedipine (systolic 149 +/- 6 to 125 +/- 4 mmHg; diastolic 92 +/- 4 to 76 +/- 3 mmHg). The minimal effective plasma level of isradipine regarding blood pressure reduction was estimated at 5 ng/ml (nifedipine: 10-25 ng/ml). During exercise both medications significantly reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure (isradipine: 40 +/- 3 to 20 +/- 1 mmHg, nifedipine: 37 +/- 4 to 22 +/- 1 mmHg), pulmonary artery wedge pressure (isradipine: 23 +/- 3 to 10 +/- 1 mmHg, nifedipine 24 +/- 3 to 14 +/- 1 mmHg), and diastolic arterial pressure (isradipine: 103 +/- 3 to 73 +/- 4 mmHg, nifedipine: 99 +/- 3 to 91 +/- 2 mmHg), whereas systolic pressure was reduced by only isradipine (189 +/- 4 to 147 +/- 5 mmHg). Neither medication significantly changed electrocardiographic ST depression during exercise.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burger et al. (1989) conducted an RCT in Stable, angiographically confirmed coronary heart disease. Intravenous isradipine vs. Nifedipine was evaluated on Hemodynamic and antianginal effects. Intravenous isradipine produced a significantly greater reduction in resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to nifedipine in patients with stable coronary heart disease.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: