Key result
Esophageal instrumentation with EGD in a patient with a suspected atrio-esophageal fistula following a VATS maze procedure resulted in sudden hemodynamic compromise and massive air embolism.
Case Report (n=1)
Esophageal instrumentation such as EGD or TEE should be strictly avoided in patients with suspected atrioesophageal fistula following atrial fibrillation ablation due to the high risk of massive air embolism and catastrophic hemodynamic compromise.
Supports caution with esophageal instrumentation in suspected atrioesophageal fistula; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
A 74-year-old female underwent an uneventful bilateral thoracoscopic maze procedure for persistent atrial fibrillation with continuous transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) guidance. She presented six weeks later with persistent fever and focal neurological signs. Computed tomography of the thorax revealed air in the posterior LA, raising suspicion for an abscess versus an atrioesophageal fistula (AEF). Before undergoing an exploratory median sternotomy, an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was performed by the surgeon to check for any esophageal pathology. This however, resulted in sudden hemodynamic compromise that required intensive treatment with vasopressors and inotropes. In this case-report, we review the various intraoperative risk factors associated with the development of AEF during cardiac ablation procedures as well as the potential hazards of esophageal instrumentation with TEE, naso- or oro- gastric devices, and/or an EGD when an AEF is suspected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agarwal et al. (2018) conducted a case report in Atrial fibrillation (n=1). Esophageal instrumentation (EGD/TEE) was evaluated. Esophageal instrumentation with EGD in a patient with a suspected atrio-esophageal fistula following a VATS maze procedure resulted in sudden hemodynamic compromise and massive air embolism.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: