Stage-I zoea larvae became more positively phototactic and less negatively phototactic after 1 day of starvation. Stage-II larvae also had an increased positive phototaxis after 1 or 2 days of starvation, but their negative phototaxis was not changed. Later stages did not have altered phototaxis during starvation. 2. The swimming speeds of starved larvae were generally lower than those of fed larvae, but there was no further reduction in the swimming speed after the first day of starvation. 3. When kept in a 12:12 light: dark cycle, larvae of all stages consumed more food during the day than at night, but feeding in the dark was still effective. Therefore, there probably is little effect of nutritional condition on phototaxis over the course of a day. 4. The altered phototaxis of starved larvae would move them higher in the water column, where food is presumably more abundant, and would also increase their opportunity to be carried into new regions of an estuary where they could encounter food. However, the reduced negative phototaxis and lowered swimming speeds of starved larvae probably would place them in increased risk of both predation and export from estuarine waters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cronin et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: