Key result
Sugammadex offers significant clinical advantages over current anticholinesterase reversal drugs, and cost-effective analysis suggests it should be considered for wider use in North America.
Why the study?
Does sugammadex provide clinical advantages and cost-effectiveness compared to current anticholinesterase reversal drugs in North America?
Does sugammadex provide clinical advantages and cost-effectiveness compared to current anticholinesterase reversal drugs in North America?
Sugammadex offers clinical advantages and appears cost-effective for wider use in anesthesia practice in North America.
May support wider North American use; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before practice change.
Sugammadex offers significant advantages over the current anticholinesterase reversal drugs. Sugammadex used has been approved for the United Stated and for Canada since December 2015 and February 2016, respectively. The present article aims to provide a straightforward and concise review of the most recent literature describing its clinical advantages in routine use. A thorough and cost-effective evaluation has been conducted specifically for North America to determine if its price justifies its inclusion into regular patients’ care. The search examined the relevant literature from January 2013 to October 2016. The present narrative review describes how sugammadex could play a crucial role in the modern conduct of anesthesia. The particular emphasis on sugammadex cost-effective analysis performed in this article suggests that this new reversal agent should be considered for a wider use in North America.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaouter et al. (2017) conducted a review in Anesthesia. Sugammadex vs. Anticholinesterase reversal drugs was evaluated. Sugammadex offers significant clinical advantages over current anticholinesterase reversal drugs, and cost-effective analysis suggests it should be considered for wider use in North America.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: