Municipal landfills contain elevated PFAS in leachate and gas condensate which can contaminate groundwater and burden wastewater treatment facilities. Gas condensate and leachate were collected from young (primarily active in the last 5 years) and mature (active 1960's to 2010's) municipal landfill piles, together with groundwater and leachate at point-of-discharge. The sum of 30 analyzed PFAS ranged from 0.11 μg/L in groundwater to 8.8 μg/L in young leachate, with young landfill samples containing twice the PFAS of mature samples. Batch adsorption tests found ion exchange (IEX) outperforms granular activated carbon (GAC) based on higher PFAS affinity (up to Freundlich K = 393 μg/g/μg/L, n = 1.0) and uptake (pseudo-first order rate constant k 1 = 0.03–0.05/min). Poor dissolved organic carbon (DOC) uptake was observed for both GAC and IEX (10–20% removal), while bicarbonate uptake coupled with chloride release (equivalent to 30–50% resin capacity) confirms electrostatic exchange even in saline leachate. Batch electrochemical treatment was less effective at treating young leachate than mature leachate, achieving 50% removal of ΣPFAS after 12 h in the former compared to near-complete removal for mature leachate. Higher organic content and chloride in young leachate (DOC = 2 g/L, chloride = 1 g/L) than mature leachate (DOC = 1.5 g/L, chloride = 0.5 g/L) resulted in significant energy diversion (DOC removal 65%) to the detriment of PFAS destruction. IEX and electrochemical treatment achieve significant PFAS removal from landfill condensate and leachate, with mature landfill waste emerging as a strategic target for further treatment testing. • Young leachate has double the PFAS of mature leachate particularly C6-10. • Vapour partitioning occurs through both volatilization and aerosolization. • Ion exchange maintains high PFAS selectivity against 10 5 times the organic matter. • Electrochemical process fully destroys PFAS except in young organic-rich leachate. • Ion exchange and electrochemical PFAS treatment are viable for landfill waste.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: