Key result
A QTc difference between leads V1 and V6 of ≥20 ms identified acute pulmonary thromboembolism with 82.2% sensitivity and 100% specificity.
Why the study?
Does the QTc difference between leads V1 and V6 accurately diagnose acute pulmonary thromboembolism in patients with suspected PTE?
Observational (n=89)
No
Does the QTc difference between leads V1 and V6 accurately diagnose acute pulmonary thromboembolism in patients with suspected PTE?
Absolute Event Rate: 34.8% vs -12.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
A QTc difference between leads V1 and V6 of ≥20 ms provides excellent diagnostic value for identifying acute pulmonary thromboembolism.
In acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), right ventricular pressure overload impairs right-sided cardiac conduction and repolarization. We hypothesized that if heterogeneity of repolarization between right and left ventricles occurs in acute PTE, there would be the difference of repolarization between them. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of corrected QT interval (QTc) difference between leads V1 and V6 (V1 - V6) in patients with acute PTE.A total of 89 patients with suspected acute PTE who underwent computed tomographic angiography (CTA) were enrolled from January to December 2015. PTE was identified by CTA. We compared electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters, especially QTc difference (V1 - V6) between patients with PTE and those without PTE.Acute PTE was finally diagnosed in 45 patients. Clinical situations including the chief complaint were not different between PTE and non-PTE groups. S1Q3T3, a traditional ECG marker, had no diagnostic value for acute PTE. Patients with PTE had a significantly longer mean QTc in V1 (454.6 ± 44.3 vs 417.5 ± 31.3 ms, P < .001) and larger QTc difference (V1 - V6) (34.8 ± 30.5 vs -12.5 ± 16.6 ms, P < .001) than non-PTE controls. QTc difference (V1 - V6) was negative in all patients without PTE. PTE patients had a higher prevalence of T wave inversion in leads III (51.1% vs 29.5%, P = .038) and V1 (82.2% vs 38.6%, P < .001). A QTc difference (V1 - V6) of ≥20 ms identified PTE with 82.2% sensitivity, 100.0% specificity, and 100.0% positive predictive value.QTc difference (V1 - V6) had an excellent diagnostic value for differentiating patients with and without acute PTE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Suspected acute pulmonary thromboembolism (n=89). QTc difference between leads V1 and V6 (V1-V6) vs. Patients without pulmonary thromboembolism was evaluated on Mean QTc difference (V1-V6) in ms (p=<0.001). A QTc difference between leads V1 and V6 of ≥20 ms identified acute pulmonary thromboembolism with 82.2% sensitivity and 100% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: