Key result
Myocardial perfusion scanning in diabetic patients with atypical symptoms identified significantly higher perfusion deficits in those with coronary involvement (P<0.001), with no difference in ejection fraction.
Why the study?
Autonomic nervous system dysfunction in diabetic patients can cause atypical cardiovascular disease presentations that may be missed, leaving unclear whether atypical pain reflects CAD.
Does SPECT myocardial perfusion scanning effectively risk-stratify diabetic patients with atypical cardiac symptoms?
Observational (n=222)
Does SPECT myocardial perfusion scanning effectively risk-stratify diabetic patients with atypical cardiac symptoms?
p-value: p=<0.001
SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging can identify coronary artery involvement in diabetic patients with atypical symptoms, though the authors conclude routine additional testing beyond general population standards may not be necessary.
Supports standard diagnostic evaluation for atypical symptoms irrespective of diabetes status; leaves open need for prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Autonomic nervous system dysfunction in diabetic patients can result in an atypical presentation of cardiovascular disease that can be missed. We aimed to use single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to assess cardiovascular disease (CAD) in diabetic patients with atypical pain to determine whether the pain above reflects the CAD. METHOD: Diabetic patients with atypical cardiac symptoms were referred to the SPECT department. Demographic data such as age, gender, diabetes status, and other underlying diseases were gathered. A myocardial perfusion scan was then performed. The results were recorded to evaluate the risk of myocardial ischemia and the degree of coronary artery involvement in a non-invasive manner. RESULTS: The study included 222 (177 female) subjects with mean ages of 63.01±11.62 and 59.41±9.19 in positive and negative SPECT, respectively. The most common symptoms were atypical chest pain (51.8%), followed by shortness of breath (50.5%), nausea, and syncope (0.9%). Cardiac parameters, such as the summed stress score (SSS), summed rest score (SRS), total perfusion deficit in stress (TPD-s), total perfusion deficit in rest (TPD-r), were significantly higher in the group with coronary artery involvement (P<0.001). However, ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volumes (ESV) parameters were not (P=.0.328, 0.351, and 0.443, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The mere presence of diabetes does not necessitate any additional diagnostic tests beyond those required for the general population, and it is possible to follow a diagnostic course similar to that of the general population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarejloo et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Diabetic patients with atypical cardiac symptoms (n=222). Myocardial perfusion scan (SPECT) was evaluated on Cardiac parameters including summed stress score, summed rest score, and total perfusion deficits (p=<0.001). Myocardial perfusion scanning in diabetic patients with atypical symptoms identified significantly higher perfusion deficits in those with coronary involvement (P<0.001), with no difference in ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: