Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 2021Journal of Conservative DentistryOpen Access

Comparative evaluation of different direct pulp capping agents in carious tooth: An in vivo study

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SKShikhaKamal KanodiaJIJaiprathikshaVenkatasubramanian IyerGPGirishJ Parmar

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Kanodia et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9619239c03f07461a78445https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_71_21
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Calcium Silicate and Calcium Hydroxide Materials for Pulp Capping: Biointeractivity, Porosity, Solubility and Bioactivity of Current Formulations2015 · 312 citations
  2. 2Comparison of sealing ability of ProRoot MTA, RetroMTA, and Biodentine as furcation repair materials: An ultraviolet spectrophotometric analysis2015 · 65 citations
  3. 3Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the hard tissue barrier after pulp capping with calcium hydroxide, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) or ProRoot MTA2008 · 44 citations